Andrew Fenty vs Jacob Brumm — Sioux Falls CH Qualifying Round 1

Sioux Falls CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA5
Andrew Fenty
#399ATP
1199ELO
1183Hard ELO
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
USA
Jacob Brumm
#1030ATP
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Fenty A.
6-3 6-4
Brumm J.
Fenty A.
662
Brumm J.
340

Andrew Fenty defeated Jacob Brumm 6-3 6-4 in the Sioux Falls CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrew Fenty closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fenty A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Brumm J.

Brumm J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fenty A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fenty A.Brumm J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fenty A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Brumm J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
2.5
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fenty A.Brumm J.
Freshness·
98
—

Fenty A.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Arutiunian E.[8]
Arseneault N.[6]
6-46-2
Mchugh A.[7]
Martin D.[3]
7-630-67-610
Smith K.[9]
Shah A.[1]
6-37-64
Ghibaudo A.[2]
Rocha F.
6-36-2
Boulais J.[11]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-47-5
Fenty A.[5]
Ganesan A.[10]
7-636-1
Q1
Rocha F.
Miyoshi K.[12]
7-666-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Wiskandt M.[4]
6-16-3
Arutiunian E.[8]
Teramo D.
6-16-3
Ganesan A.[10]
Harper C.
6-36-766-4
Shah A.[1]
Baris O.
7-56-4
Fenty A.[5]
Brumm J.
6-36-4
Arseneault N.[6]
Seelig K.
6-46-1
Smith K.[9]
Sheehy J.
6-36-3
Ghibaudo A.[2]
Exsted M.
6-47-5
Martin D.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-637-64
Mchugh A.[7]
Schachter N.
6-36-0
Boulais J.[11]
Kittay B.
6-46-4