Ryan Peniston vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Hersonissos 6 CH Round of 32

Hersonissos 6 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Peniston
GBR2
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#342ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Peniston R.
6-3 5-7 6-4
Stebe C.
Peniston R.
6562
Stebe C.
3741

Ryan Peniston defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-3 5-7 6-4 in the Hersonissos 6 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Peniston closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (50 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
60
75
Break points won·Clear edge
25
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
6.5+121 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
4.1
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wendelken H.
Mrva M.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Mrva M.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
6-22-66-2
Wendelken H.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Mrva M.
Hussey G.
6-16-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Albot R.
6-27-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Basing M.
6-46-1
Wendelken H.
Andaloro F.
6-26-0
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Xilas I.
6-31-66-1
Hussey G.
Preda L.
6-24-66-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Broom C.
6-36-1
Basing M.
Stewart H.
7-666-1
Mrva M.
Sakellaridis S.[6]
7-54-66-2
Andaloro F.
Peniston R.[2]
7-57-62
Wendelken H.
Novak D.
6-23-66-1
Albot R.
Coulibaly E.[5]
6-26-4
R32
Stewart H.
Blancaneaux G.[3]
6-23-0
Hussey G.
Brunclik P.
6-42-66-3
Sakellaridis S.[6]
Singh K.
3-66-46-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-1
Broom C.
Barranco Cosano J.
4-66-26-3
Albot R.
Tsitsipas P.
6-36-1
Montes De La Torre I.
Bertrand R.[7]
6-27-63
Xilas I.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-16-2
Andaloro F.
Berrettini J.
6-46-3
Peniston R.[2]
Stebe C.
6-35-76-4
Preda L.
Crawford O.[1]
7-657-5
Coulibaly E.[5]
Andreev A.
7-656-3
Mrva M.
Escoffier A.
7-57-64
Novak D.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Wendelken H.
Geerts M.[8]
6-36-767-66
Basing M.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-3