Aidan Mchugh vs Kyle Seelig — Lincoln CH Qualifying Round 1

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
GBR6
Aidan Mchugh
#460ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
USA
Kyle Seelig
#2142ATP
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
Mchugh A.
6-2 7-6
Seelig K.
Mchugh A.
6772
Seelig K.
2630

Aidan Mchugh defeated Kyle Seelig 6-2 7-6 in the Lincoln CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mchugh closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Seelig K.

Seelig K.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Serve advantage — Mchugh A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Seelig K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
55%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
52%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
31%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Seelig K.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 57 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
Arseneault N.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-5
Fenty A.[3]
Poling K.
6-27-5
Ganesan A.[9]
Martin D.[2]
6-47-63
Smith K.[8]
Mchugh A.[6]
7-617-62
Wiskandt M.[1]
Arutiunian E.[7]
5-76-36-0
Kingsley C.[5]
Boulais J.[10]
6-36-1
Q1
Fenty A.[3]
Schachter N.
6-46-4
Wiskandt M.[1]
Kumar P.
4-66-16-2
Kirchheimer S.
Miyoshi K.[11]
6-16-4
Poling K.
Sheehy J.[12]
6-33-66-3
Arseneault N.[4]
Baris O.
7-57-66
Martin D.[2]
Sysoev N.
7-56-4
Kingsley C.[5]
Perez B.
6-06-2
Boulais J.[10]
Williams C.
6-16-3
Mchugh A.[6]
Seelig K.
6-27-63
Smith K.[8]
Torres Espinosa J.
6-06-3