Daniil Glinka vs Clement Tabur — Olbia CH Round of 32

Olbia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Daniil Glinka
#167ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Glinka D.
7-6 6-3
Tabur C.
Glinka D.
7762
Tabur C.
6430

Daniil Glinka defeated Clement Tabur 7-6 6-3 in the Olbia CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniil Glinka came in ranked #167, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Daniil Glinka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniil Glinka closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenQ1hardDaniil Glinka5-7 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Glinka D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Glinka D.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Glinka D.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
74
Break points won·Clear edge
9
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Glinka D.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1491
Surface ELO
5.5+82 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1477
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1607
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
7.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Glinka D.Tabur C.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
69

Glinka D.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.
Carreno Busta P.[6]
7-656-716-2
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Grenier H.
3-66-16-1
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Landaluce M.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.
Butvilas E.
6-37-5
Grenier H.
Fatic N.
6-36-4
Landaluce M.[3]
Lajovic D.[7]
6-36-1
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Tabilo A.[1]
6-31-67-63
R16
Tabilo A.[1]
Glinka D.
6-35-76-1
Lajovic D.[7]
Molcan A.
7-666-4
Fatic N.
Caniato C.
3-66-36-3
Grenier H.
Gombos N.
7-646-1
Van Assche L.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Pavlovic L.
3-66-16-2
Butvilas E.
Gea A.
6-43-66-3
Landaluce M.[3]
Gojo B.
6-33-66-3
R32
Glinka D.
Tabur C.
7-646-3
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Basile P.
6-26-756-3
Landaluce M.[3]
Engel J.
7-57-5
Gojo B.
Forti F.
7-56-4
Lajovic D.[7]
Ribecai M.
6-24-66-1
Fatic N.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-27-5
Gombos N.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-746-4
Grenier H.
Basavareddy N.[4]
3-66-46-2
Van Assche L.
Travaglia S.
7-51-66-3
Kopriva V.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-36-4
Gea A.
Paris T.
6-26-0
Pavlovic L.
Galarneau A.
7-646-3
Tabilo A.[1]
Carboni L.
4-66-37-64
Molcan A.
Gengel M.
6-26-4
Butvilas E.
Echargui M.[8]
6-46-2
Caniato C.
Added D.
7-57-5