Charles Broom vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Hersonissos 6 CH Round of 32

Hersonissos 6 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#424ATP
1457ELO
1399Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Broom C.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Broom C.
4662
Barranco Cosano J.
6231

Charles Broom defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Hersonissos 6 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
70
Break points won·Dominant
0
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
5
Tiebreaks·Even
10
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Barranco Cosano J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2Hard Elo 1396
Surface ELO
4.8+3 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1457
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
2.8
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wendelken H.
Mrva M.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Mrva M.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
6-22-66-2
Wendelken H.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Mrva M.
Hussey G.
6-16-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Albot R.
6-27-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Basing M.
6-46-1
Wendelken H.
Andaloro F.
6-26-0
R16
Montes De La Torre I.
Xilas I.
6-31-66-1
Hussey G.
Preda L.
6-24-66-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Broom C.
6-36-1
Basing M.
Stewart H.
7-666-1
Mrva M.
Sakellaridis S.[6]
7-54-66-2
Andaloro F.
Peniston R.[2]
7-57-62
Wendelken H.
Novak D.
6-23-66-1
Albot R.
Coulibaly E.[5]
6-26-4
R32
Stewart H.
Blancaneaux G.[3]
6-23-0
Hussey G.
Brunclik P.
6-42-66-3
Sakellaridis S.[6]
Singh K.
3-66-46-3
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-46-1
Broom C.
Barranco Cosano J.
4-66-26-3
Albot R.
Tsitsipas P.
6-36-1
Montes De La Torre I.
Bertrand R.[7]
6-27-63
Xilas I.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-16-2
Andaloro F.
Berrettini J.
6-46-3
Peniston R.[2]
Stebe C.
6-35-76-4
Preda L.
Crawford O.[1]
7-657-5
Coulibaly E.[5]
Andreev A.
7-656-3
Mrva M.
Escoffier A.
7-57-64
Novak D.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Wendelken H.
Geerts M.[8]
6-36-767-66
Basing M.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-3