Suzan Lamens vs Emiliana Arango — Osaka Round of 32

Osaka · WTA · Round of 32
Suzan Lamens
NED
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
Emiliana Arango
COL
Emiliana Arango
#97WTA
1624ELO
1576Hard ELO
25 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLL
Lamens S.
6-1 6-2
Arango E.
Lamens S.
662
Arango E.
120

Suzan Lamens defeated Emiliana Arango 6-1 6-2 in the Osaka round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emiliana Arango came in ranked #97, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Suzan Lamens claimed a first win over Emiliana Arango in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-24BeijingR128hardEmiliana Arango6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lamens S.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Arango E.

Arango E.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lamens S.Arango E.
0
Serve
0
52
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lamens S.Arango E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
44%
Service points won·Even
54%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
1.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamens S.Arango E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
51
56
Break points won·Clear edge
95
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
70
Tiebreaks·Even
78
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamens S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Arango E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1573
Surface ELO
5.2+3 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1624
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.9
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lamens S.Arango E.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
88

Lamens S.: 18 days rest · Arango E.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Fernandez L.[4]
Valentova T.
6-05-76-3
Semi-finals
Fernandez L.[4]
Cirstea S.
6-12-66-4
Valentova T.
Cristian J.
6-736-46-3
Quarter-finals
Cristian J.
Osaka N.[1]
W/O
Fernandez L.[4]
Sramkova R.
7-626-3
Valentova T.
Danilovic O.[6]
4-66-26-3
Cirstea S.
Golubic V.
6-22-66-2
R16
Osaka N.[1]
Lamens S.
7-663-66-2
Cristian J.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[8]
0-66-46-2
Sramkova R.
Li A.[7]
6-23-66-3
Cirstea S.
Boulter K.
6-36-1
Golubic V.
Bouzkova M.[5]
1-66-27-63
Valentova T.
Mertens E.[3]
6-46-1
Danilovic O.[6]
Krueger A.
6-46-4
Fernandez L.[4]
Galfi D.
6-16-4
R32
Cristian J.
Cocciaretto E.
6-27-64
Valentova T.
Eala A.
6-16-2
Danilovic O.[6]
Hibino N.
6-41-66-2
Boulter K.
Noskova L.[2]
7-636-3
Bouzas Maneiro J.[8]
Volynets K.
6-26-4
Mertens E.[3]
Bucsa C.
7-656-3
Golubic V.
Andreescu B.
6-34-66-4
Fernandez L.[4]
Baptiste H.
6-27-5
Sramkova R.
Garland J.
6-36-1
Galfi D.
Parks A.
6-46-4
Bouzkova M.[5]
Shibahara E.
6-16-1
Cirstea S.
Uchijima M.
2-66-46-2
Li A.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-46-0
Krueger A.
Sakkari M.
2-66-36-4
Osaka N.[1]
Sonobe W.
6-06-4
Lamens S.
Arango E.
6-16-2