Shintaro Mochizuki vs Bernard Tomic — Jinan CH Quarter-final

Jinan CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Shintaro Mochizuki
JPN7
Shintaro Mochizuki
#151ATP
1475ELO
1425Hard ELO
$243kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Mochizuki S.
6-1 6-4
Tomic B.
Mochizuki S.
662
Tomic B.
140

Shintaro Mochizuki defeated Bernard Tomic 6-1 6-4 in the Jinan CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mochizuki S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mochizuki S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mochizuki S.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mochizuki S.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
92
Break points won·Dominant
55
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
74
Tiebreaks·Even
80
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mochizuki S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1425
Surface ELO
5.4+16 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1475
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.1
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mochizuki S.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
80
78

Mochizuki S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.[1]
Mcdonald M.[6]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-16-2
Mcdonald M.[6]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.[7]
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Bar Biryukov P.
Smith C.
6-47-64
Mcdonald M.[6]
Holt B.
6-34-67-67
Cazaux A.[1]
Zhou Y.
6-43-66-0
R16
Smith C.
Droguet T.
6-13-67-5
Cazaux A.[1]
Draxl L.
6-27-63
Zhou Y.
Hijikata R.
7-53-66-4
Tomic B.
Harris B.
6-46-746-2
Holt B.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-3
Mcdonald M.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Wong C.
6-46-757-65
Mochizuki S.[7]
Jacquet K.
6-36-2
R32
Tomic B.
Svrcina D.[4]
6-10-66-2
Draxl L.
Oconnell C.
4-61-1
Jacquet K.
Samrej K.
7-56-2
Harris B.
Watanuki Y.
1-66-36-2
Smith C.
Duckworth J.[8]
6-47-66
Droguet T.
Cui J.
6-46-1
Bar Biryukov P.
Daniel T.
7-654-66-3
Wong C.
Djere L.[3]
7-6106-2
Kotov P.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Holt B.
Zhukov M.
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-36-4
Hijikata R.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-2
Zhou Y.
Schoolkate T.[5]
7-626-4
Mcdonald M.[6]
Mayot H.
6-37-62
Mochizuki S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-4
Walton A.[2]
Sun F.
3-67-56-4