Luka Mikrut vs Carlos Taberner — Valencia CH Semi-final

Valencia CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CRO
Luka Mikrut
#172ATP
1597ELO
1619Clay ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP3
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Mikrut L.
7-6 6-0
Taberner C.
Mikrut L.
71262
Taberner C.
61000

Luka Mikrut defeated Carlos Taberner 7-6 6-0 in the Valencia CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mikrut L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mikrut L.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mikrut L.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
53
Break points saved·Even
77
74
Break points won·Dominant
29
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mikrut L.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+14 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Clay Elo 1605
4.3Overall Elo 1597
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.2
Surface form
5.6
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d
6.9
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Mikrut L.
4-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Mikrut L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-6106-0
Choinski J.
Squire H.
6-727-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mikrut L.
Negritu C.
4-67-646-4
Taberner C.[3]
Trungelliti M.[9]
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Ramos A.
6-47-5
Squire H.
Nagal S.
7-656-4
R16
Nagal S.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-33-66-3
Mikrut L.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-36-1
Negritu C.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Ramos A.
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Choinski J.
Gakhov I.
4-66-36-4
Taberner C.[3]
Pavlovic L.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Lajovic D.[6]
3-66-06-4
Trungelliti M.[9]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-40-0
R32
Taberner C.[3]
Dedura Palomero D.
3-66-44-2
Choinski J.
Damas M.
6-726-36-3
Nagal S.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-06-1
Lajovic D.[6]
Pereira T.
6-46-1
Trungelliti M.[9]
Fatic N.
2-66-36-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Travaglia S.
7-51-67-65
Mikrut L.
Moro Canas A.
4-66-26-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Buse I.[4]
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Cretu C.
6-13-66-4
Pavlovic L.
Zapata Miralles B.
2-66-16-1
Ramos A.
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
Negritu C.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Gakhov I.
Gaubas V.[10]
6-24-66-3
Lopez Montagud C.
Moller E.[5]
6-46-4