Jay Dylan Hara Friend vs Daniel Milavsky — Fairfield CH Quarter-final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
1503ELO
1480Hard ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
hard
USA
Daniel Milavsky
#335ATP
1349ELO
1337Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Friend J.
7-6 6-0
Milavsky D.
Friend J.
7762
Milavsky D.
6500

Jay Dylan Hara Friend defeated Daniel Milavsky 7-6 6-0 in the Fairfield CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Friend J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Milavsky D.

Milavsky D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Friend J.

Serve advantage — Friend J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Friend J.Milavsky D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Friend J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 41 days (−0.7)
Milavsky D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+143 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1337
6.6Overall Elo 1503
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Friend J.Milavsky D.
Freshness·Clear edge
89
68

Friend J.: 10 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Milavsky D.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Friend J.
Winter E.
6-736-36-2
Semi-finals
Winter E.
Ilagan A.
6-36-2
Friend J.
Johns G.[4]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Johns G.[4]
Rosenkranz M.[6]
6-776-26-3
Winter E.
Shelbayh A.[5]
4-66-46-2
Friend J.
Milavsky D.
7-656-0
Ilagan A.
Rolland D.
7-657-61
R16
Rolland D.
Zink T.
6-46-2
Shelbayh A.[5]
Pascual Ferra R.
6-26-4
Milavsky D.
Popko D.[2]
4-66-36-4
Johns G.[4]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Friend J.
Mmoh M.[8]
6-27-64
Rosenkranz M.[6]
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Winter E.
Gengel M.[3]
6-47-69
Ilagan A.
Hassan B.[1]
6-45-76-4
R32
Hassan B.[1]
Colson T.
6-43-66-1
Ilagan A.
Bigun K.
4-66-46-3
Rolland D.
Mckennon M.
6-26-0
Gengel M.[3]
Bynoe E.
6-46-1
Winter E.
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Braswell M.
Tarvet O.
4-66-26-1
Popko D.[2]
Wiskandt M.
6-37-5
Friend J.
Shah A.
6-23-66-2
Pascual Ferra R.
Van Loben Sels E.
5-76-27-5
Shelbayh A.[5]
Artnak B.
6-17-5
Rosenkranz M.[6]
Mccormick T.
6-06-2
Fenty A.
Kingsley C.
6-756-46-4
Johns G.[4]
Sekulic P.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.[8]
Vandecasteele Q.
7-656-3
Milavsky D.
King D.
6-36-1
Zink T.
Bouzige M.[7]
6-36-1