Marco Trungelliti vs Nerman Fatic — Valencia CH Round of 32

Valencia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marco Trungelliti
ARG9
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Trungelliti M.
2-6 6-3 6-4
Fatic N.
Trungelliti M.
2662
Fatic N.
6341

Marco Trungelliti defeated Nerman Fatic 2-6 6-3 6-4 in the Valencia CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
63
Break points won·Clear edge
24
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 23 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
7.2+143 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1478
7.0Overall Elo 1627
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1496
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.1
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
Freshness·
89
—

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Mikrut L.
4-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Mikrut L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-6106-0
Choinski J.
Squire H.
6-727-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mikrut L.
Negritu C.
4-67-646-4
Taberner C.[3]
Trungelliti M.[9]
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Ramos A.
6-47-5
Squire H.
Nagal S.
7-656-4
R16
Nagal S.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-33-66-3
Mikrut L.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-36-1
Negritu C.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Ramos A.
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Choinski J.
Gakhov I.
4-66-36-4
Taberner C.[3]
Pavlovic L.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Lajovic D.[6]
3-66-06-4
Trungelliti M.[9]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-40-0
R32
Taberner C.[3]
Dedura Palomero D.
3-66-44-2
Choinski J.
Damas M.
6-726-36-3
Nagal S.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-06-1
Lajovic D.[6]
Pereira T.
6-46-1
Trungelliti M.[9]
Fatic N.
2-66-36-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Travaglia S.
7-51-67-65
Mikrut L.
Moro Canas A.
4-66-26-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Buse I.[4]
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Cretu C.
6-13-66-4
Pavlovic L.
Zapata Miralles B.
2-66-16-1
Ramos A.
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
Negritu C.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Gakhov I.
Gaubas V.[10]
6-24-66-3
Lopez Montagud C.
Moller E.[5]
6-46-4