Ryan Peniston vs Antoine Escoffier — Hersonissos 5 CH Semi-final

Hersonissos 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Ryan Peniston
GBR4
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#581ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
Peniston R.
7-6 6-1
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7762
Escoffier A.
6410

Ryan Peniston defeated Antoine Escoffier 7-6 6-1 in the Hersonissos 5 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Peniston came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (50 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
20
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
68
Break points won·Slight edge
25
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
5.1+11 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1436
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Peniston R.[4]
Coppejans K.[1]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.[1]
Barton H.
4-67-676-3
Peniston R.[4]
Escoffier A.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Peniston R.[4]
Coulibaly E.
7-56-3
Escoffier A.
Geerts M.
6-22-66-2
Barton H.
Wendelken H.
6-32-66-3
Coppejans K.[1]
Albot R.
6-46-3
R16
Coppejans K.[1]
Samuel T.
6-22-66-2
Coulibaly E.
Bailly G.[6]
6-13-66-1
Peniston R.[4]
Visker N.
6-36-1
Geerts M.
Broom C.
7-56-4
Barton H.
Loffhagen G.[5]
6-36-1
Escoffier A.
Tsitsipas P.
5-76-27-62
Wendelken H.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-46-3
Albot R.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
W/O
R32
Visker N.
Tsitsipas P.
1-0
Montes De La Torre I.
Cina F.[3]
6-36-1
Barton H.
Basing M.
6-47-64
Escoffier A.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-26-4
Tsitsipas P.
Strombachs R.
4-67-56-4
Geerts M.
Xilas I.
6-46-4
Broom C.
Crawford O.[2]
3-67-656-3
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Novak D.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.[1]
Butvilas E.
0-67-656-2
Wendelken H.
Hussey G.
6-16-1
Coulibaly E.
Mrva M.
6-37-62
Bailly G.[6]
Andreev A.
6-26-4
Loffhagen G.[5]
Boitan G.
6-46-2
Peniston R.[4]
Sakellaridis D.
6-35-76-2
Samuel T.
Rottgering M.
6-36-1
Albot R.
Singh K.
6-26-3