Ryan Peniston vs Kimmer Coppejans — Hersonissos 5 CH Final

Hersonissos 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Ryan Peniston
GBR4
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
hard
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL1
Kimmer Coppejans
#222ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Peniston R.
6-3 7-5
Coppejans K.
Peniston R.
672
Coppejans K.
350

Ryan Peniston defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-3 7-5 in the Hersonissos 5 CH final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Peniston closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (50 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
20
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
67
Break points won·Even
25
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Coppejans K.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
5.8+67 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Peniston R.Coppejans K.
Freshness·
—
68

Coppejans K.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Peniston R.[4]
Coppejans K.[1]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.[1]
Barton H.
4-67-676-3
Peniston R.[4]
Escoffier A.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Peniston R.[4]
Coulibaly E.
7-56-3
Escoffier A.
Geerts M.
6-22-66-2
Barton H.
Wendelken H.
6-32-66-3
Coppejans K.[1]
Albot R.
6-46-3
R16
Coppejans K.[1]
Samuel T.
6-22-66-2
Coulibaly E.
Bailly G.[6]
6-13-66-1
Peniston R.[4]
Visker N.
6-36-1
Geerts M.
Broom C.
7-56-4
Barton H.
Loffhagen G.[5]
6-36-1
Escoffier A.
Tsitsipas P.
5-76-27-62
Wendelken H.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-46-3
Albot R.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
W/O
R32
Visker N.
Tsitsipas P.
1-0
Montes De La Torre I.
Cina F.[3]
6-36-1
Barton H.
Basing M.
6-47-64
Escoffier A.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-26-4
Tsitsipas P.
Strombachs R.
4-67-56-4
Geerts M.
Xilas I.
6-46-4
Broom C.
Crawford O.[2]
3-67-656-3
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Novak D.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.[1]
Butvilas E.
0-67-656-2
Wendelken H.
Hussey G.
6-16-1
Coulibaly E.
Mrva M.
6-37-62
Bailly G.[6]
Andreev A.
6-26-4
Loffhagen G.[5]
Boitan G.
6-46-2
Peniston R.[4]
Sakellaridis D.
6-35-76-2
Samuel T.
Rottgering M.
6-36-1
Albot R.
Singh K.
6-26-3