Jan Choinski vs Miguel Damas — Valencia CH Round of 32

Valencia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2025
clay
ESP
Miguel Damas
#300ATP
1398ELO
1370Clay ELO
26 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLLLL
Choinski J.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Damas M.
Choinski J.
62662
Damas M.
77331

Jan Choinski defeated Miguel Damas 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the Valencia CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Damas M.

Damas M.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Damas M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
1.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Damas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
0
Break points saved·Dominant
90
29
Break points won·Even
20
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
1
Tiebreaks·Even
41
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Choinski J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Damas M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+283 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1370
6.6Overall Elo 1686
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1398
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Damas M.
Freshness·Slight edge
49
59

Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d) · Damas M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 103 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Mikrut L.
4-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Mikrut L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-6106-0
Choinski J.
Squire H.
6-727-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mikrut L.
Negritu C.
4-67-646-4
Taberner C.[3]
Trungelliti M.[9]
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Ramos A.
6-47-5
Squire H.
Nagal S.
7-656-4
R16
Nagal S.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-33-66-3
Mikrut L.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-36-1
Negritu C.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Ramos A.
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Choinski J.
Gakhov I.
4-66-36-4
Taberner C.[3]
Pavlovic L.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Lajovic D.[6]
3-66-06-4
Trungelliti M.[9]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-40-0
R32
Taberner C.[3]
Dedura Palomero D.
3-66-44-2
Choinski J.
Damas M.
6-726-36-3
Nagal S.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-06-1
Lajovic D.[6]
Pereira T.
6-46-1
Trungelliti M.[9]
Fatic N.
2-66-36-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Travaglia S.
7-51-67-65
Mikrut L.
Moro Canas A.
4-66-26-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Buse I.[4]
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Cretu C.
6-13-66-4
Pavlovic L.
Zapata Miralles B.
2-66-16-1
Ramos A.
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
Negritu C.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Gakhov I.
Gaubas V.[10]
6-24-66-3
Lopez Montagud C.
Moller E.[5]
6-46-4