August Holmgren vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Shanghai Masters Qualifying Round 1

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
DEN
August Holmgren
#192ATP
1566ELO
1517Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$646kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 1 October 2025
hard
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE16
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Holmgren A.
4-6 7-5 6-3
Tseng C.
Holmgren A.
4762
Tseng C.
6531

August Holmgren defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the Shanghai Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holmgren A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Holmgren A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holmgren A.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holmgren A.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Clear edge
0
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
46
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holmgren A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tseng C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+22 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1495
5.2Overall Elo 1566
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1554
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holmgren A.Tseng C.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
100

Holmgren A.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Tseng C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
28°COvercast
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 62%
Q2
Royer V.[2]
Harris B.[18]
7-626-4
Holmgren A.
Onclin G.
6-47-63
Trotter J.
Hijikata R.[12]
6-35-76-4
Basilashvili N.[8]
Spizzirri E.[17]
6-46-4
Blanchet U.[21]
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[3]
Watanuki Y.[20]
6-46-0
Hanfmann Y.
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Nishioka Y.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-3
Tabilo A.[1]
Mayot H.[22]
6-36-4
Sakamoto R.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-46-3
Schoolkate T.[7]
Zhukayev B.
6-37-65
Vacherot V.
Draxl L.[14]
4-67-656-4
Q1
Nishioka Y.
Noguchi R.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[7]
Mccabe J.
3-67-616-2
Svrcina D.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-26-4
Vukic A.[4]
Huesler M.
1-67-57-65
Holmgren A.
Tseng C.[16]
4-67-56-3
Zhukayev B.
Smith C.[19]
7-637-65
Mayot H.[22]
Sun F.
7-56-3
Royer V.[2]
Droguet T.
6-16-2
Vacherot V.
Basavareddy N.[10]
6-776-46-2
Hijikata R.[12]
Napolitano S.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Boyer T.[15]
5-76-46-2
Eubanks C.
Misolic F.[6]
7-54-66-2
Hanfmann Y.
Mochizuki S.[9]
6-37-5
Spizzirri E.[17]
Xiao L.
6-46-1
Sakamoto R.
Holt B.[13]
6-17-5
Mcdonald M.[5]
Jasika O.
6-06-4
Tabilo A.[1]
Cui J.
6-37-5
Watanuki Y.[20]
Liu H.
7-636-2
Harris B.[18]
Daniel T.
6-46-2
Onclin G.
Duckworth J.[11]
7-607-5
Basilashvili N.[8]
Tomic B.
4-66-36-1
Blanchet U.[21]
Te R.
6-46-3
Draxl L.[14]
Jacquet K.
6-46-717-65
Kubler J.
Wong C.[24]
7-646-3