Valentin Vacherot vs Nishesh BasavareddyShanghai Masters Qualifying Round 1

Shanghai Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
#20ATP
1903ELO
1852Hard ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 1 October 2025
hard
#135ATP
1722ELO
1681Hard ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Vacherot V.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Basavareddy N.
Vacherot V.
67662
Basavareddy N.
79421

Valentin Vacherot defeated Nishesh Basavareddy 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Shanghai Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #20, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Valentin Vacherot extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

10
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-01Shanghai MastersQ1hardValentin Vacherot6-7(7) 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Vacherot V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Basavareddy N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Vacherot V.Basavareddy N.
67
Serve
20
23
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
69
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
90
Break points won·Clear edge
33
49
Deciding sets·Even
95
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast