Rafael Jodar vs Nicolas Mejia — Tiburon CH Quarter-final

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 September 2025
hard
Nicolas Mejia
COL5
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1424Hard ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Jodar R.
6-0 6-2
Mejia N.
Jodar R.
662
Mejia N.
020

Rafael Jodar defeated Nicolas Mejia 6-0 6-2 in the Tiburon CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #25.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Mejia N.
18
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jodar R.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
74
Break points won·Dominant
71
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
8.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mejia N.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.9+449 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Hard Elo 1424
10.0Overall Elo 1999
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1477
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.6
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Mejia N.
Freshness·Dominant
85
47

Jodar R.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mejia N.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Zheng M.[7]
Jodar R.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Zink T.
Banerjee S.
6-41-66-3
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-2
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[5]
6-06-2
Zheng M.[7]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
R16
Shelbayh A.
Perez A.
4-66-36-2
Popko D.[6]
Artnak B.
6-26-4
Mejia N.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
2-66-47-65
Banerjee S.
Hassan B.[4]
6-17-5
Zink T.
Monday J.[8]
6-46-3
Jodar R.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-26-3
Zheng M.[7]
Wallin O.
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Cassone M.[2]
6-36-736-2
R32
Hassan B.[4]
Johns G.
Rybakov A.
Monday J.[8]
Jodar R.
Ilagan A.
6-33-66-1
Krueger M.
Masur D.
2-66-46-2
Popko D.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-25-76-2
Rosenkranz M.
Gengel M.
7-646-2
Banerjee S.
Sekulic P.
6-15-76-4
Shelbayh A.
Rodionov J.[1]
7-636-4
Cassone M.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-36-2
Wallin O.
Damm M.
2-67-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Chan D.
6-36-3
Zheng M.[7]
Tarvet O.
6-46-3
Artnak B.
Tokuda R.
6-16-776-4
Perez A.
Svajda T.
6-46-4
Zink T.
Braswell M.
6-16-4
Mejia N.[5]
Martin A.
6-44-67-65