Federico Agustin Gomez vs Emilio Nava — Antofagasta CH Round of 16

Antofagasta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 September 2025
clay
Emilio Nava
USA1
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Gomez F.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Nava E.
Gomez F.
4662
Nava E.
6441

Federico Agustin Gomez defeated Emilio Nava 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Antofagasta CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gomez F.Nava E.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
3

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gomez F.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez F.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
94
Break points won·Even
18
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Nava E.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.9Clay Elo 1410
Surface ELO
8.1+276 Clay Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1445
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
3.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez F.Nava E.
Freshness·Dominant
52
96

Gomez F.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d) · Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Garin C.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.
2-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Garin C.[2]
Vallejo A.
7-656-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Gomez F.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Guillen Meza A.
6-746-26-2
Vallejo A.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-36-2
Garin C.[2]
Habib H.[6]
7-6111-66-3
R16
Gomez F.
Nava E.[1]
4-66-46-4
Guillen Meza A.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Neumayer L.[7]
6-46-3
Vallejo A.
Thanos A.
6-36-3
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Midon L.
6-26-2
Habib H.[6]
Zarate C.
3-67-646-4
Garin C.[2]
Roncadelli F.
2-66-16-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
W/O
R32
Gomez F.
Aguilar Cardozo J.
7-56-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Soto M.
6-36-3
Guillen Meza A.
Dellien H.[3]
3-67-606-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Kicker N.
7-626-4
Neumayer L.[7]
Torres J.
6-16-0
Vallejo A.
Collarini A.
1-66-16-2
Midon L.
Ambrogi L.
6-44-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-26-4
Habib H.[6]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-34-66-2
Zarate C.
Nunez D.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.
Maestrelli F.[5]
6-33-66-2
Thanos A.
Dellien Velasco M.
7-56-0
Roncadelli F.
Villanueva G.
6-36-0
Nava E.[1]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-4
Garin C.[2]
Torrealba B.
6-36-2