Martin Landaluce vs Oliver Crawford — Villena CH Round of 16

Villena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Landaluce
ESP5
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1685Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 September 2025
hard
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1413Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
Landaluce M.
6-4 6-4
Crawford O.
Landaluce M.
662
Crawford O.
440

Martin Landaluce defeated Oliver Crawford 6-4 6-4 in the Villena CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Landaluce came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Landaluce edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Crawford O.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Crawford O.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Crawford O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
12
Break points saved·Dominant
92
64
Break points won·Even
17
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Crawford O.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+272 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Hard Elo 1413
8.2Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1444
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.5
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Crawford O.
Freshness·
100
—

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Grenier H.
4-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Brunclik P.
6-46-3
Grenier H.
Merida Aguilar D.[8]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Merida Aguilar D.[8]
Loffhagen G.
6-11-67-5
Grenier H.
Gentzsch T.
7-56-2
Brunclik P.
Potenza L.
6-46-3
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Landaluce M.[5]
6-36-1
R16
Landaluce M.[5]
Crawford O.
6-46-4
Merida Aguilar D.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-3
Potenza L.
Butvilas E.
6-16-4
Grenier H.
Echargui M.[6]
6-46-4
Gentzsch T.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Loffhagen G.
Durasovic V.
4-66-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Coulibaly E.
6-46-3
Brunclik P.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-2
R32
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Blanch D.
6-24-66-3
Brunclik P.
Hussey G.
7-56-1
Loffhagen G.
Barroso Campos A.
6-36-1
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.
7-636-4
Gentzsch T.
Jarry N.[2]
7-646-3
Crawford O.
Carboni L.
6-26-1
Landaluce M.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-44-66-3
Durasovic V.
Klein L.[4]
7-646-2
Grenier H.
Barton H.
6-36-3
Coulibaly E.
Negritu C.
3-67-56-4
Butvilas E.
Struff J.[1]
6-46-2
Merida Aguilar D.[8]
Peniston R.
6-46-2
Echargui M.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-46-4
Kasnikowski M.
Ramos A.
6-26-4
Potenza L.
Blanch D.
6-47-5
Oberleitner N.
Gea A.
7-666-4