Tyler Zink vs Micah Braswell — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 September 2025
hard
USA
Micah Braswell
#969ATP
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWW
Zink T.
6-1 6-4
Braswell M.
Zink T.
662
Braswell M.
140

Tyler Zink defeated Micah Braswell 6-1 6-4 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Braswell M.

Braswell M.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Braswell M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Braswell M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 224 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Braswell M.
Freshness·
85
—

Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Zheng M.[7]
Jodar R.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Zink T.
Banerjee S.
6-41-66-3
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-2
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[5]
6-06-2
Zheng M.[7]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
R16
Shelbayh A.
Perez A.
4-66-36-2
Popko D.[6]
Artnak B.
6-26-4
Mejia N.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
2-66-47-65
Banerjee S.
Hassan B.[4]
6-17-5
Zink T.
Monday J.[8]
6-46-3
Jodar R.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-26-3
Zheng M.[7]
Wallin O.
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Cassone M.[2]
6-36-736-2
R32
Hassan B.[4]
Johns G.
Rybakov A.
Monday J.[8]
Jodar R.
Ilagan A.
6-33-66-1
Krueger M.
Masur D.
2-66-46-2
Popko D.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-25-76-2
Rosenkranz M.
Gengel M.
7-646-2
Banerjee S.
Sekulic P.
6-15-76-4
Shelbayh A.
Rodionov J.[1]
7-636-4
Cassone M.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-36-2
Wallin O.
Damm M.
2-67-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Chan D.
6-36-3
Zheng M.[7]
Tarvet O.
6-46-3
Artnak B.
Tokuda R.
6-16-776-4
Perez A.
Svajda T.
6-46-4
Zink T.
Braswell M.
6-16-4
Mejia N.[5]
Martin A.
6-44-67-65