Emina Bektas vs Louisa Chirico — W50 Rancho Santa Fe CA Round of 16

W50 Rancho Santa Fe CA · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Emina Bektas
#581WTA
1510ELO
1482Hard ELO
33 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 September 2025
hard
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#320WTA
1476ELO
1411Hard ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Bektas E.
6-1 5-7 6-4
Chirico L.
Bektas E.
6562
Chirico L.
1741

Emina Bektas defeated Louisa Chirico 6-1 5-7 6-4 in the W50 Rancho Santa Fe CA round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Emina Bektas came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bektas E.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Chirico L.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Bektas E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bektas E.Chirico L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
53%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
5.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bektas E.Chirico L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
28
Break points saved·Dominant
82
46
Break points won·Dominant
35
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bektas E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Chirico L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+71 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1411
5.4Overall Elo 1510
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1476
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
2.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gadecki O.
Jones E.
2-66-24-1
Semi-finals
Jones E.
Shymanovich I.
6-26-2
Gadecki O.
Scott K.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Gadecki O.
Sakatsume H.
6-47-63
Shymanovich I.
Mandlik E.
6-36-2
Jones E.
Pareja J.
7-56-3
Scott K.
Bektas E.
0-0
R16
Sakatsume H.
Mcadoo R.
7-646-1
Mandlik E.
Kalieva E.
6-16-3
Shymanovich I.
Crawley F.
6-756-26-3
Scott K.
Gasanova A.
6-46-4
Jones E.
Cayetano E.
6-36-4
Gadecki O.
Hruncakova V.
7-646-2
Pareja J.
Urhobo A.
6-23-66-4
Bektas E.
Chirico L.
6-15-76-4
R32
Mandlik E.
Buchnik M.
5-76-26-2
Shymanovich I.
Rogers A.
6-27-5
Urhobo A.
Inoue H.
6-26-2
Jones E.
Sonobe W.
7-56-2
Mcadoo R.
Hu V.
6-47-65
Bektas E.
Kozyreva M.
6-16-4
Gasanova A.
Nijkamp R.
7-56-3
Cayetano E.
Rajecki A.
7-56-3
Sakatsume H.
Allen V.
6-36-4
Gadecki O.
Mcdonald E.
6-31-66-3
Hruncakova V.
Lincer O.
6-16-3
Scott K.
Giavara H.
6-06-4
Kalieva E.
Lewis M.
2-66-36-3
Pareja J.
Sebov K.
7-57-65
Chirico L.
Yamalapalli S.
7-56-3
Crawley F.
Miroshnichenko V.
6-43-66-1