Arthur Cazaux vs Juncheng Shang — Beijing Round of 32

Beijing · ATP · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#78ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 25 September 2025
hard
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Cazaux A.
0-6 7-6 7-5
Shang J.
Cazaux A.
07772
Shang J.
66551

Arthur Cazaux defeated Juncheng Shang 0-6 7-6 7-5 in the Beijing round of 32 on hard. Arthur Cazaux claimed a first win over Juncheng Shang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-24AtlantaQ2hardJuncheng Shang6-4 6-7(2) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Shang J.
40
Serve
34
19
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Shang J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
76
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Clear edge
27
45
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Shang J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+39 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1698
5.6Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1746
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.1
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
2.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
5.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
26°COvercast
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tien L.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Tien L.
Medvedev D.[8]
5-77-54-0
Sinner J.[1]
De Minaur A.[3]
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Tien L.
Musetti L.[4]
4-66-33-0
De Minaur A.[3]
Mensik J.[7]
4-1
Medvedev D.[8]
Zverev A.[2]
6-36-3
Sinner J.[1]
Marozsan F.
6-17-5
R16
De Minaur A.[3]
Rinderknech A.
6-33-67-62
Tien L.
Cobolli F.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.
Muller A.
6-37-65
Medvedev D.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-36-3
Mensik J.[7]
Cazaux A.
6-32-66-4
Musetti L.[4]
Mannarino A.
6-36-3
Zverev A.[2]
Moutet C.
7-53-66-3
Sinner J.[1]
Atmane T.
6-45-76-0
R32
Sinner J.[1]
Cilic M.
6-26-2
Tien L.
Cerundolo F.
4-66-36-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sonego L.
6-46-3
Moutet C.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-5
De Minaur A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-0
Muller A.
Khachanov K.[5]
4-67-656-4
Rinderknech A.
Goffin D.
6-43-66-4
Cobolli F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-636-3
Atmane T.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Bonzi B.
7-616-3
Cazaux A.
Shang J.
0-67-657-5
Musetti L.[4]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-636-746-4
Medvedev D.[8]
Norrie C.
6-36-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-3
Mannarino A.
Bublik A.
6-36-2
Mensik J.[7]
Kecmanovic M.
7-56-4