Jakub Mensik vs Arthur Cazaux — Beijing Round of 16

Beijing · ATP · Round of 16
Jakub Mensik
CZE7
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 25 September 2025
hard
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Mensik J.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6262
Cazaux A.
3641

Jakub Mensik defeated Arthur Cazaux 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Beijing round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #19, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Jakub Mensik closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Cazaux A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mensik J.Cazaux A.
42
Serve
40
51
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mensik J.Cazaux A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.9
8.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mensik J.Cazaux A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
65
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Dominant
77
27
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mensik J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Cazaux A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+155 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1738
6.8Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1793
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.4
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
2.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mensik J.Cazaux A.
Freshness·
90
—

Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
26°COvercast
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tien L.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Tien L.
Medvedev D.[8]
5-77-54-0
Sinner J.[1]
De Minaur A.[3]
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Tien L.
Musetti L.[4]
4-66-33-0
De Minaur A.[3]
Mensik J.[7]
4-1
Medvedev D.[8]
Zverev A.[2]
6-36-3
Sinner J.[1]
Marozsan F.
6-17-5
R16
De Minaur A.[3]
Rinderknech A.
6-33-67-62
Tien L.
Cobolli F.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.
Muller A.
6-37-65
Medvedev D.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-36-3
Mensik J.[7]
Cazaux A.
6-32-66-4
Musetti L.[4]
Mannarino A.
6-36-3
Zverev A.[2]
Moutet C.
7-53-66-3
Sinner J.[1]
Atmane T.
6-45-76-0
R32
Sinner J.[1]
Cilic M.
6-26-2
Tien L.
Cerundolo F.
4-66-36-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sonego L.
6-46-3
Moutet C.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-5
De Minaur A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-0
Muller A.
Khachanov K.[5]
4-67-656-4
Rinderknech A.
Goffin D.
6-43-66-4
Cobolli F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-636-3
Atmane T.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Bonzi B.
7-616-3
Cazaux A.
Shang J.
0-67-657-5
Musetti L.[4]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-636-746-4
Medvedev D.[8]
Norrie C.
6-36-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-3
Mannarino A.
Bublik A.
6-36-2
Mensik J.[7]
Kecmanovic M.
7-56-4