Philip Sekulic vs Mitchell Krueger — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 September 2025
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA7
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Sekulic P.
6-3 2-6 7-6
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
62772
Krueger M.
36631

Philip Sekulic defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-3 2-6 7-6 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Philip Sekulic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sekulic P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sekulic P.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sekulic P.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
87
Break points won·Slight edge
9
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sekulic P.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Krueger M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1363
Surface ELO
6.9+72 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1461
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.1
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.2
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sekulic P.Krueger M.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
100

Sekulic P.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Krueger M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shelbayh A.
Rybakov A.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Shelbayh A.
Hassan B.[4]
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Ilagan A.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Shelbayh A.
Rodionov J.[1]
3-66-46-2
Hassan B.[4]
Fenty A.
6-41-66-1
Rybakov A.
Sekulic P.
7-656-4
Ilagan A.
Bouzige M.
5-76-46-1
R16
Fenty A.
Bicknell B.
6-36-726-4
Sekulic P.
Fellin P.
6-46-2
Rybakov A.
Trotter J.[3]
6-47-68
Ilagan A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Mejia N.[5]
7-56-1
Rodionov J.[1]
Williams C.
6-46-3
Bouzige M.
Wallin O.
6-747-616-3
Hassan B.[4]
Martin A.
6-717-56-3
R32
Bouzige M.
Papamalamis T.
3-64-1
Rodionov J.[1]
Johns G.
4-67-646-4
Williams C.
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-1
Mejia N.[5]
Zink T.
4-66-37-5
Hassan B.[4]
Winter E.
7-642-66-3
Martin A.
Masur D.
6-46-3
Bicknell B.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Fenty A.
Monday J.[8]
7-646-4
Sekulic P.
Krueger M.[7]
6-32-67-63
Fellin P.
Bondioli F.
2-67-636-2
Wallin O.
Pinnington Jones J.[2]
1-66-36-2
Ilagan A.
King D.
6-26-3
Popko D.[6]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-47-5
Trotter J.[3]
Colson T.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.
Perez A.
6-36-4
Rybakov A.
Cox T.
6-36-1