Lloyd Harris vs Brandon Holt — Jingshan CH Round of 32

Jingshan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#160ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 September 2025
hard
USA6
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Harris L.
6-4 6-4
Holt B.
Harris L.
662
Holt B.
440

Lloyd Harris defeated Brandon Holt 6-4 6-4 in the Jingshan CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
85
Break points won·Slight edge
24
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Holt B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+133 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1507
6.8Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Spizzirri E.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Spizzirri E.
Hanfmann Y.
7-54-66-4
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.[2]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Spizzirri E.
Harris L.
7-640-0
Hanfmann Y.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-3
Bolt A.
Harris B.
6-32-66-3
Mcdonald M.[2]
Tomic B.
7-57-65
R16
Yevseyev D.
Smith C.
3-66-36-3
Hanfmann Y.
Tseng C.
6-16-746-0
Spizzirri E.
Svrcina D.[3]
4-66-46-2
Harris B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Jasika O.
4-66-46-1
Tomic B.
Basilashvili N.[5]
6-16-0
Mcdonald M.[2]
Onclin G.
7-656-4
Harris L.
Eubanks C.
7-56-2
R32
Yevseyev D.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Tseng C.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Svrcina D.[3]
Sin S.
6-16-0
Draxl L.[8]
Skatov T.
6-44-67-61
Jasika O.
Cui J.
4-67-656-4
Basilashvili N.[5]
Holmgren A.
6-26-3
Tomic B.
Zhang T.
6-46-1
Harris L.
Holt B.[6]
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-1
Eubanks C.
Sharipov M.
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.
Boyer T.[7]
6-727-666-4
Mcdonald M.[2]
Te R.
6-46-4
Smith C.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-06-2
Onclin G.
Hsu Y.
7-646-1
Bolt A.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-26-717-65
Harris B.
Bar Biryukov P.
7-617-64