Yiming Dang vs Sakura Hosogi — W100 Incheon Round of 16

W100 Incheon · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN
Yiming Dang
#714WTA
21 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 September 2025
hard
JPN
Sakura Hosogi
#360WTA
1358ELO
1344Hard ELO
26 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Dang Y.
6-2 1-6 7-6
Hosogi S.
Dang Y.
61772
Hosogi S.
26641

Yiming Dang defeated Sakura Hosogi 6-2 1-6 7-6 in the W100 Incheon round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Yiming Dang closed it out in three sets, 6–2 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dang Y.serving36% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Hosogi S.

Hosogi S.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Dang Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dang Y.Hosogi S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
57%
73%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
46%
Service points won·Even
52%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dang Y.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hosogi S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Hibino N.
Lee E.
7-57-62
Semi-finals
Lee E.
Kaji H.
7-56-1
Hibino N.
Saito S.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Saito S.
Dang Y.
6-46-0
Lee E.
Imamura S.
6-16-3
Kaji H.
Kuramochi M.
6-46-3
Hibino N.
Ku Y.
4-66-26-2
R16
Ku Y.
Matsuda M.
6-26-3
Hibino N.
Shimizu E.
6-36-4
Kaji H.
Zhu A.
6-36-4
Imamura S.
Naklo T.
6-26-3
Lee E.
Panshina V.
6-06-0
Saito S.
Kawaguchi N.
6-46-4
Kuramochi M.
Kobori M.
6-36-3
Dang Y.
Hosogi S.
6-21-67-64
R32
Ku Y.
Kim D.
6-36-1
Kobori M.
Back D.
6-03-66-3
Zhu A.
Choi S.
2-67-627-65
Imamura S.
Chang H.
6-26-3
Kaji H.
Plipuech P.
6-47-64
Hibino N.
Hule P.
6-36-0
Matsuda M.
Koshiishi A.
6-44-66-2
Naklo T.
Jeong B.
1-67-56-4
Shimizu E.
Muramatsu C.
6-36-2
Lee E.
Park S.
6-46-1
Saito S.
Jang S.
6-36-3
Kawaguchi N.
Lee Y.
6-17-5
Hosogi S.
Choi O.
6-26-1
Panshina V.
Nugroho P.
6-12-67-5
Kuramochi M.
Kolodynska J.
6-46-3
Dang Y.
Sato H.
6-46-2