Nicolas Kicker vs Facundo Bagnis — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#327ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 September 2025
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#439ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Kicker N.
6-3 6-4
Bagnis F.
Kicker N.
662
Bagnis F.
340

Nicolas Kicker defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-3 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending the title. Nicolas Kicker claimed a first win over Facundo Bagnis in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaR32clayFacundo Bagnis6-1 6-4
2016-02-22Sao PauloQ1clayFacundo Bagnis5-7 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
54
Break points saved·Dominant
56
92
Break points won·Slight edge
45
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.0Clay Elo 1373
Surface ELO
8.0+211 Clay Elo edge
2.0Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
8.0Overall Elo 1591
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
8.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Burruchaga R.[6]
Barrena A.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Barrena A.
Guillen Meza A.
6-16-1
Burruchaga R.[6]
Kicker N.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-17-66
Kicker N.
Bueno G.
6-26-2
Barrena A.
Justo G.
6-26-716-3
Guillen Meza A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
1-66-46-4
R16
Barrena A.
Dellien H.[3]
6-11-0
Olivieri G.
Vallejo A.
6-36-2
Bueno G.
Maestrelli F.[7]
6-37-63
Guillen Meza A.
Prado Angelo J.
6-16-2
Justo G.
Rodriguez L.
7-636-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-03-66-4
Burruchaga R.[6]
Collarini A.
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Bagnis F.
6-36-4
R32
Collarini A.
Ambrogi L.
7-652-66-3
Rodriguez L.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-1
Vallejo A.
Tirante T.[1]
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-4
Kicker N.
Garin C.[4]
6-36-4
Maestrelli F.[7]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-34-66-3
Justo G.
Ficovich J.[5]
6-37-61
Guillen Meza A.
Habib H.[8]
6-747-686-4
Prado Angelo J.
Midon L.
7-54-66-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Soto M.
6-16-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Nava E.[2]
4-67-57-5
Barrena A.
Torres J.
6-15-76-4
Bagnis F.
Villanueva G.
6-03-66-3
Bueno G.
Gomez F.
3-66-37-63
Dellien H.[3]
Varillas J.
6-27-63
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-23-66-3