Jack Loge vs John Sperle — Targu Mures 2 CH Qualifying Round 2

Targu Mures 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
BEL6
Jack Loge
#407ATP
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 16 September 2025
clay
GER
John Sperle
#833ATP
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLL
Loge J.
6-2 7-6
Sperle J.
Loge J.
6772
Sperle J.
2630

Jack Loge defeated John Sperle 6-2 7-6 in the Targu Mures 2 CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Loge closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Loge J.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sperle J.

Sperle J.serving51% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Loge J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Loge J.Sperle J.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
40%
Break points saved·Even
52%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.8
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (9 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Loge J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sperle J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Loge J.Sperle J.
Freshness·Dominant
70
96

Loge J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 84 games (7d) · Sperle J.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Faurel T.[12]
Papoe R.
6-756-17-63
Campana Lee G.[2]
Kivattsev K.[11]
6-16-2
Tomescu D.[8]
Pennaforti G.[3]
6-16-2
Uta D.
Compagnucci T.[4]
3-67-56-3
Raynel A.
Cadenasso G.[5]
7-656-4
Loge J.[6]
Sperle J.
6-27-63
Q1
Pennaforti G.[3]
Lopez Morillo I.
6-46-3
Raynel A.
Romano F.[9]
3-66-46-2
Uta D.
Perez B.
6-36-3
Papoe R.
Martin D.[1]
6-43-66-3
Campana Lee G.[2]
Varbanciu M.
6-26-0
Faurel T.[12]
Martin Manzano J.
7-56-1
Kivattsev K.[11]
Siniakov D.
6-43-66-3
Tomescu D.[8]
Miletich I.
4-66-36-4
Compagnucci T.[4]
Palosi S.
7-636-3
Cadenasso G.[5]
Berge Nourescu A.
6-16-4
Loge J.[6]
Pop D.
7-56-0
Sperle J.
Demanet E.[10]
5-76-17-5