Sebastian Gima vs Mihai Alexandru Coman — Targu Mures 2 CH Round of 32

Targu Mures 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Sebastian Gima
#532ATP
1179ELO
1183Clay ELO
24 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 16 September 2025
clay
ROU
Mihai Alexandru Coman
#1458ATP
21 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLL
Gima S.
6-2 6-2
Coman M.
Gima S.
662
Coman M.
220

Sebastian Gima defeated Mihai Alexandru Coman 6-2 6-2 in the Targu Mures 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gima S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Coman M.

Coman M.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gima S.

Serve advantage — Gima S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Gima S.Coman M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
52%
33%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
51%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
27%
Break points saved·Dominant
58%
27%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
0.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gima S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Coman M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gima S.Coman M.
Freshness·
97
—

Gima S.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Clarke J.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-0
Agamenone F.
Erhard M.[4]
6-06-2
Quarter-finals
Damas M.
Picchione A.
6-33-2
Clarke J.[1]
Boitan G.
6-07-5
Erhard M.[4]
Denolly C.
6-06-3
Agamenone F.
Rincon D.[2]
6-27-5
R16
Picchione A.
Kuzmanov D.[3]
7-646-737-62
Clarke J.[1]
Raynel A.
6-26-4
Boitan G.
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
6-726-36-4
Damas M.
Brunold M.[8]
6-36-1
Denolly C.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-33-67-65
Erhard M.[4]
Gima S.
6-36-4
Agamenone F.
Jianu F.[5]
6-46-3
Rincon D.[2]
Loge J.
1-66-16-3
R32
Alcala Gurri M.
Giustino L.[6]
7-622-1
Raynel A.
Uta D.
6-16-1
Clarke J.[1]
Ovcharenko O.
6-06-4
Alvarez Varona N.[7]
Roncadelli F.
6-46-4
Kuzmanov D.[3]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-634-66-1
Picchione A.
Tomescu D.
6-26-3
Damas M.
Nijboer R.
6-36-2
Brunold M.[8]
Marti Pujolras A.
6-46-4
Denolly C.
Campana Lee G.
6-727-646-2
Gima S.
Coman M.
6-26-2
Erhard M.[4]
Mrva M.
7-667-5
Agamenone F.
Faurel T.
6-16-3
Loge J.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-43-66-3
Rincon D.[2]
Ionel N.
6-06-2
Jianu F.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-726-3
Boitan G.
Bentzel C.
6-06-3