Tyler Zink vs Abedallah Shelbayh — Columbus CH Round of 16

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
JOR
Abedallah Shelbayh
1442ELO
1448Hard ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Zink T.
6-4 7-6
Shelbayh A.
Zink T.
6782
Shelbayh A.
4660

Tyler Zink defeated Abedallah Shelbayh 6-4 7-6 in the Columbus CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Abedallah Shelbayh came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shelbayh A.

Shelbayh A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Shelbayh A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Shelbayh A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1351
Surface ELO
6.1+97 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1371
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1442
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Shelbayh A.
Freshness·Clear edge
85
100

Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Shelbayh A.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Damm M.[7]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Masur D.
6-36-2
Damm M.[7]
Banerjee S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Damm M.[7]
Trotter J.[3]
7-54-67-5
Banerjee S.
Zink T.
6-36-1
Masur D.
Jodar R.
6-17-5
Zheng M.
Perez A.
6-23-66-3
R16
Perez A.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Zheng M.
Ilagan A.
6-37-61
Jodar R.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Martin A.[6]
3-67-56-3
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Damm M.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-4
Trotter J.[3]
Maloney P.
6-26-3
Banerjee S.
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
R32
Zheng M.
Johns G.[8]
6-06-4
Rybakov A.
Bouzige M.
6-16-2
Masur D.
Stearns P.
6-46-747-65
Martin A.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-36-2
Ghibaudo A.
Anthrop J.
3-66-17-64
Maloney P.
Brunclik P.
6-46-0
Blanch D.
Monday J.[5]
6-33-67-65
Banerjee S.
Langmo C.
7-626-2
Trotter J.[3]
Sekulic P.
6-46-1
Shelbayh A.
Cassone M.[2]
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[4]
6-36-2
Zink T.
Bernard A.
6-36-3
Damm M.[7]
Kim A.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Papamalamis T.
6-17-5
Perez A.
Ficovich J.[1]
4-0
Ilagan A.
Dominko S.
6-33-66-4