Suzan Lamens vs Tatjana Maria — Seoul Round of 32

Seoul · WTA · Round of 32
Suzan Lamens
NED
Suzan Lamens
#147WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
Tatjana Maria
GER
Tatjana Maria
#76WTA
1703ELO
1608Hard ELO
38 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Lamens S.
6-4 6-1
Maria T.
Lamens S.
662
Maria T.
410

Suzan Lamens defeated Tatjana Maria 6-4 6-1 in the Seoul round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tatjana Maria came in ranked #76, defending last year's round of 32. Suzan Lamens extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-10BJK Cup QualifiersRR–Suzan Lamens3-6 6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Lamens S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Maria T.

Maria T.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lamens S.Maria T.
0
Serve
9
52
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lamens S.Maria T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
45%
Service points won·Even
54%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
41%
Break points saved·Even
52%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamens S.Maria T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
51
31
Break points won·Clear edge
95
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamens S.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 29 days (−0.3)
Maria T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Hard Elo 1573
Surface ELO
5.0+36 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1703
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lamens S.Maria T.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Lamens S.: 20 days rest · Maria T.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 81 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[1]
Alexandrova E.[2]
1-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Joint M.
6-06-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Krejcikova B.
6-06-3
Siniakova K.
Lamens S.
6-17-5
Alexandrova E.[2]
Seidel E.
6-26-3
Joint M.
Tauson C.[3]
6-06-3
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Cirstea S.
6-36-2
Krejcikova B.
Raducanu E.[8]
4-67-6106-1
Seidel E.
Haddad Maia B.[6]
6-747-637-5
Joint M.
Kenin S.[7]
6-36-1
Siniakova K.
Kasatkina D.[4]
7-626-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Boisson L.
4-66-26-2
Lamens S.
Shnaider D.[5]
6-46-4
Tauson C.[3]
Lys E.
6-27-64
R32
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Back D.
6-46-3
Lys E.
Krueger A.
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.
Prozorova T.
6-16-2
Cirstea S.
Zakharova A.
6-36-1
Raducanu E.[8]
Cristian J.
6-36-4
Boisson L.
Ku Y.
6-26-1
Seidel E.
Ponchet J.
5-76-46-2
Kenin S.[7]
Siegemund L.
2-66-37-5
Joint M.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-47-64
Lamens S.
Maria T.
6-46-1
Siniakova K.
Park S.
6-26-2
Shnaider D.[5]
Mcnally C.
2-66-26-4