Maya Joint vs Clara Tauson — Seoul Quarter-final

Seoul · WTA · Quarter-final
Maya Joint
AUS
Maya Joint
#77WTA
1659ELO
1657Hard ELO
$391kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
Clara Tauson
DEN3
Clara Tauson
#30WTA
1802ELO
1775Hard ELO
$792kYTD
$5.2MCAREER
23 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Joint M.
6-0 6-3
Tauson C.
Joint M.
662
Tauson C.
030

Maya Joint defeated Clara Tauson 6-0 6-3 in the Seoul quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Clara Tauson came in ranked #30.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Joint M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tauson C.

Tauson C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Joint M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Joint M.Tauson C.
17
Serve
56
45
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Joint M.Tauson C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
61%
Return points won·Even
46%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Joint M.Tauson C.
Clutch Rating·Even
77
73
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
93
Break points won·Slight edge
99
93
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
57
Tiebreaks·
—
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Joint M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 29 days (−0.3)
Tauson C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 39 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1657
Surface ELO
6.1+118 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1659
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1802
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Joint M.Tauson C.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
98

Joint M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tauson C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[1]
Alexandrova E.[2]
1-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Joint M.
6-06-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Krejcikova B.
6-06-3
Siniakova K.
Lamens S.
6-17-5
Alexandrova E.[2]
Seidel E.
6-26-3
Joint M.
Tauson C.[3]
6-06-3
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Cirstea S.
6-36-2
Krejcikova B.
Raducanu E.[8]
4-67-6106-1
Seidel E.
Haddad Maia B.[6]
6-747-637-5
Joint M.
Kenin S.[7]
6-36-1
Siniakova K.
Kasatkina D.[4]
7-626-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Boisson L.
4-66-26-2
Lamens S.
Shnaider D.[5]
6-46-4
Tauson C.[3]
Lys E.
6-27-64
R32
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Back D.
6-46-3
Lys E.
Krueger A.
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.
Prozorova T.
6-16-2
Cirstea S.
Zakharova A.
6-36-1
Raducanu E.[8]
Cristian J.
6-36-4
Boisson L.
Ku Y.
6-26-1
Seidel E.
Ponchet J.
5-76-46-2
Kenin S.[7]
Siegemund L.
2-66-37-5
Joint M.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-47-64
Lamens S.
Maria T.
6-46-1
Siniakova K.
Park S.
6-26-2
Shnaider D.[5]
Mcnally C.
2-66-26-4