Maya Joint vs Sofia Kenin — Seoul Round of 16

Seoul · WTA · Round of 16
Maya Joint
AUS
Maya Joint
#87WTA
1659ELO
1657Hard ELO
$391kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
Sofia Kenin
USA7
Sofia Kenin
#105WTA
1694ELO
1659Hard ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
Joint M.
6-3 6-1
Kenin S.
Joint M.
662
Kenin S.
310

Maya Joint defeated Sofia Kenin 6-3 6-1 in the Seoul round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Maya Joint came in ranked #87, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Maya Joint extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-12AdelaideR32hardMaya Joint7-6(3) 6-4
2025-01-06HobartQFhardMaya Joint6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Joint M.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kenin S.

Kenin S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Joint M.

Serve advantage — Joint M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Joint M.Kenin S.
17
Serve
13
45
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Joint M.Kenin S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Joint M.Kenin S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
77
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
92
Break points won·Clear edge
99
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
54
Tiebreaks·
—
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Joint M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 29 days (−0.3)
Kenin S.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 39 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.3Hard Elo 1657
Surface ELO
4.7+1 Hard Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1659
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1694
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.6
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Joint M.Kenin S.
Freshness·Even
91
91

Joint M.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kenin S.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[1]
Alexandrova E.[2]
1-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Joint M.
6-06-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Krejcikova B.
6-06-3
Siniakova K.
Lamens S.
6-17-5
Alexandrova E.[2]
Seidel E.
6-26-3
Joint M.
Tauson C.[3]
6-06-3
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Cirstea S.
6-36-2
Krejcikova B.
Raducanu E.[8]
4-67-6106-1
Seidel E.
Haddad Maia B.[6]
6-747-637-5
Joint M.
Kenin S.[7]
6-36-1
Siniakova K.
Kasatkina D.[4]
7-626-2
Alexandrova E.[2]
Boisson L.
4-66-26-2
Lamens S.
Shnaider D.[5]
6-46-4
Tauson C.[3]
Lys E.
6-27-64
R32
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Back D.
6-46-3
Lys E.
Krueger A.
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.
Prozorova T.
6-16-2
Cirstea S.
Zakharova A.
6-36-1
Raducanu E.[8]
Cristian J.
6-36-4
Boisson L.
Ku Y.
6-26-1
Seidel E.
Ponchet J.
5-76-46-2
Kenin S.[7]
Siegemund L.
2-66-37-5
Joint M.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-47-64
Lamens S.
Maria T.
6-46-1
Siniakova K.
Park S.
6-26-2
Shnaider D.[5]
Mcnally C.
2-66-26-4