Rafael Jodar vs Nicolas Mejia — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
Nicolas Mejia
COL4
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1424Hard ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Jodar R.
6-3 6-2
Mejia N.
Jodar R.
662
Mejia N.
320

Rafael Jodar defeated Nicolas Mejia 6-3 6-2 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #25.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Mejia N.
18
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jodar R.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
74
Break points won·Dominant
71
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mejia N.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.9+449 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Hard Elo 1424
10.0Overall Elo 1999
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
4.7
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Mejia N.
Freshness·Dominant
85
47

Jodar R.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mejia N.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Damm M.[7]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Masur D.
6-36-2
Damm M.[7]
Banerjee S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Damm M.[7]
Trotter J.[3]
7-54-67-5
Banerjee S.
Zink T.
6-36-1
Masur D.
Jodar R.
6-17-5
Zheng M.
Perez A.
6-23-66-3
R16
Perez A.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Zheng M.
Ilagan A.
6-37-61
Jodar R.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Martin A.[6]
3-67-56-3
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Damm M.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-4
Trotter J.[3]
Maloney P.
6-26-3
Banerjee S.
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
R32
Zheng M.
Johns G.[8]
6-06-4
Rybakov A.
Bouzige M.
6-16-2
Masur D.
Stearns P.
6-46-747-65
Martin A.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-36-2
Ghibaudo A.
Anthrop J.
3-66-17-64
Maloney P.
Brunclik P.
6-46-0
Blanch D.
Monday J.[5]
6-33-67-65
Banerjee S.
Langmo C.
7-626-2
Trotter J.[3]
Sekulic P.
6-46-1
Shelbayh A.
Cassone M.[2]
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[4]
6-36-2
Zink T.
Bernard A.
6-36-3
Damm M.[7]
Kim A.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Papamalamis T.
6-17-5
Perez A.
Ficovich J.[1]
4-0
Ilagan A.
Dominko S.
6-33-66-4