Daniel Masur vs Rafael Jodar — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Masur D.
6-1 7-5
Jodar R.
Masur D.
672
Jodar R.
150

Daniel Masur defeated Rafael Jodar 6-1 7-5 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #25.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Masur came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Jodar R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Masur D.Jodar R.
—
Serve
18
—
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Jodar R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
56%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (57 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Jodar R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
86
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
91
Break points won·Dominant
5
71
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
13
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Masur D.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Jodar R.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
10.0+490 Hard Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1413
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 1999
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
6.5
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Jodar R.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
85

Masur D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Jodar R.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Damm M.[7]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Masur D.
6-36-2
Damm M.[7]
Banerjee S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Damm M.[7]
Trotter J.[3]
7-54-67-5
Banerjee S.
Zink T.
6-36-1
Masur D.
Jodar R.
6-17-5
Zheng M.
Perez A.
6-23-66-3
R16
Perez A.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Zheng M.
Ilagan A.
6-37-61
Jodar R.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Martin A.[6]
3-67-56-3
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Damm M.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-4
Trotter J.[3]
Maloney P.
6-26-3
Banerjee S.
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
R32
Zheng M.
Johns G.[8]
6-06-4
Rybakov A.
Bouzige M.
6-16-2
Masur D.
Stearns P.
6-46-747-65
Martin A.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-36-2
Ghibaudo A.
Anthrop J.
3-66-17-64
Maloney P.
Brunclik P.
6-46-0
Blanch D.
Monday J.[5]
6-33-67-65
Banerjee S.
Langmo C.
7-626-2
Trotter J.[3]
Sekulic P.
6-46-1
Shelbayh A.
Cassone M.[2]
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[4]
6-36-2
Zink T.
Bernard A.
6-36-3
Damm M.[7]
Kim A.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Papamalamis T.
6-17-5
Perez A.
Ficovich J.[1]
4-0
Ilagan A.
Dominko S.
6-33-66-4