Martin Damm vs James Trotter — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Martin Damm
USA7
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2025
hard
JPN3
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Damm M.
7-5 4-6 7-5
Trotter J.
Damm M.
7472
Trotter J.
5651

Martin Damm defeated James Trotter 7-5 4-6 7-5 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Trotter J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Trotter J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
Return points won·Even
33%
34%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.9
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Trotter J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
40
Break points saved·Even
93
90
Break points won·Even
1
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Trotter J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.3+276 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.7Hard Elo 1380
8.4Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1414
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
5.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Trotter J.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
75

Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Damm M.[7]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Masur D.
6-36-2
Damm M.[7]
Banerjee S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Damm M.[7]
Trotter J.[3]
7-54-67-5
Banerjee S.
Zink T.
6-36-1
Masur D.
Jodar R.
6-17-5
Zheng M.
Perez A.
6-23-66-3
R16
Perez A.
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Zheng M.
Ilagan A.
6-37-61
Jodar R.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Martin A.[6]
3-67-56-3
Zink T.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Damm M.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-36-4
Trotter J.[3]
Maloney P.
6-26-3
Banerjee S.
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
R32
Zheng M.
Johns G.[8]
6-06-4
Rybakov A.
Bouzige M.
6-16-2
Masur D.
Stearns P.
6-46-747-65
Martin A.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-36-2
Ghibaudo A.
Anthrop J.
3-66-17-64
Maloney P.
Brunclik P.
6-46-0
Blanch D.
Monday J.[5]
6-33-67-65
Banerjee S.
Langmo C.
7-626-2
Trotter J.[3]
Sekulic P.
6-46-1
Shelbayh A.
Cassone M.[2]
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Mejia N.[4]
6-36-2
Zink T.
Bernard A.
6-36-3
Damm M.[7]
Kim A.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Papamalamis T.
6-17-5
Perez A.
Ficovich J.[1]
4-0
Ilagan A.
Dominko S.
6-33-66-4