Quinn Vandecasteele vs James Trotter — Winston Salem CH Round of 32

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Quinn Vandecasteele
#461ATP
1383ELO
1368Hard ELO
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Vandecasteele Q.
6-2 6-4
Trotter J.
Vandecasteele Q.
662
Trotter J.
240

Quinn Vandecasteele defeated James Trotter 6-2 6-4 in the Winston Salem CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vandecasteele Q.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Trotter J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Vandecasteele Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vandecasteele Q.Trotter J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
8.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vandecasteele Q.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Trotter J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1368
Surface ELO
5.1+13 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1383
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1414
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.4
Surface form
4.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vandecasteele Q.Trotter J.
Freshness·Slight edge
66
61

Vandecasteele Q.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 91 games (7d) · Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4