Philip Sekulic vs Daniel Milavsky — Winston Salem CH Round of 32

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
USA
Daniel Milavsky
#335ATP
1349ELO
1337Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Sekulic P.
7-6 6-4
Milavsky D.
Sekulic P.
7762
Milavsky D.
6240

Philip Sekulic defeated Daniel Milavsky 7-6 6-4 in the Winston Salem CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sekulic P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Milavsky D.

Milavsky D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sekulic P.Milavsky D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sekulic P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Milavsky D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6+26 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.4Hard Elo 1337
4.9Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sekulic P.Milavsky D.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
68

Sekulic P.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Milavsky D.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4