Elena Micic vs Naomi Mckenzie — W35 Wagga Wagga Round of 16

W35 Wagga Wagga · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Elena Micic
#310WTA
1399ELO
1380Hard ELO
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
AUS
Naomi Mckenzie
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLW
Micic E.
6-4 6-4
Mckenzie N.
Micic E.
662
Mckenzie N.
44–

Elena Micic defeated Naomi Mckenzie 6-4 6-4 in the W35 Wagga Wagga round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Elena Micic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Micic E.serving51% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Mckenzie N.

Mckenzie N.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Micic E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Micic E.Mckenzie N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
56%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
51%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
0.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Micic E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Mckenzie N.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.2
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Micic E.Mckenzie N.
Freshness·
91
—

Micic E.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 14 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Swan K.
Preston T.
6-16-2
Preston T.
Swan K.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Swan K.
Cabrera L.
6-47-68
Preston T.
Micic E.
2-66-16-2
Preston T.
Kinoshita H.
6-34-67-5
Swan K.
Sema E.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Swan K.
Barry M.
6-16-0
Cabrera L.
Sema E.
4-66-27-5
Preston T.
Kinoshita H.
7-676-3
Micic E.
Arakawa H.
2-66-46-1
Swan K.
Kokkinis T.
6-36-2
Preston T.
Arakawa H.
7-56-1
Kinoshita H.
Thompson B.
6-26-4
Sema E.
Korhonen C.
6-16-4
R16
Cabrera L.
Tse E.
6-36-4
Swan K.
Kokkinis T.
6-23-0
Arakawa H.
Lopez P.
6-46-2
Micic E.
Mckenzie N.
6-46-4
Kinoshita H.
Smith A.
6-06-2
Preston T.
Khan L.
6-736-17-66
Barry M.
Rokusek S.
6-06-3
Sema E.
Yang Y.
6-17-5
Kokkinis T.
Arakawa N.
6-16-0
Swan K.
Smith A.
6-16-2
Kinoshita H.
Varaksina A.
2-66-16-0
Sema E.
Miyamoto A.
6-36-2
Arakawa H.
Yang Y.
6-23-66-2
Thompson B.
Khan L.
1-66-37-65
Korhonen C.
Sycamore A.
6-46-0
R32
Arakawa H.
Kim E.
6-06-1
Kinoshita H.
Arakawa N.
6-16-2
Cabrera L.
Miyamoto A.
6-26-2
Preston T.
Sandhu G.
6-26-4
Tse E.
Mihulka B.
6-16-3
Rokusek S.
Thompson B.
6-36-3
Barry M.
Cvijanovic J.
6-36-1
Swan K.
Guillen G.
6-36-0
Lopez P.
Hupfeld S.
6-16-0
Kokkinis T.
Varaksina A.
6-36-2
Khan L.
Sato H.
6-06-1
Yang Y.
Carbis J.
6-26-0
Sema E.
Ohashi Y.
6-26-1
Smith A.
Cheung K.
7-53-66-0
Mckenzie N.
Korhonen C.
7-56-1
Micic E.
Situe S.
6-37-65
Yang Y.
Ohashi Y.
6-26-3
Sema E.
Guillen G.
6-36-1
Kinoshita H.
Tse E.
6-46-1
Sycamore A.
Cui A.
6-46-3
Mckenzie N.
Sato H.
6-46-2
Khan L.
Micic E.
6-46-2
Swan K.
Baker C.
6-16-3
Miyamoto A.
Dodaj C.
6-16-3
Smith A.
Rokusek S.
6-06-1
Arakawa N.
Barry M.
4-66-36-3
Preston T.
Ivanov E.
6-27-64
Kokkinis T.
Kim E.
6-46-1
Arakawa H.
Cvijanovic J.
6-06-0
Thompson B.
Sandhu G.
6-33-66-2
Varaksina A.
Aulia A.
7-657-68
Korhonen C.
Cabrera L.
4-2