Mitchell Krueger vs Tyler Zink — Winston Salem CH Round of 32

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA3
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Krueger M.
6-1 6-2
Zink T.
Krueger M.
662
Zink T.
120

Mitchell Krueger defeated Tyler Zink 6-1 6-2 in the Winston Salem CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Zink T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 32 days (−0.7)
Zink T.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 32 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.3+85 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1351
6.3Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1371
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.9
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Zink T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
85

Krueger M.: 15 days rest · Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4