Luka Mikrut vs Zdenek Kolar — Biella CH Quarter-final

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
CRO
Luka Mikrut
#180ATP
1597ELO
1619Clay ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
clay
Zdenek Kolar
CZE2
Zdenek Kolar
#154ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Mikrut L.
6-2 6-1
Kolar Z.
Mikrut L.
662
Kolar Z.
210

Luka Mikrut defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-2 6-1 in the Biella CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mikrut L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mikrut L.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mikrut L.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
53
Break points won·Even
29
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
81
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mikrut L.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Kolar Z.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+134 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1485
5.6Overall Elo 1597
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1506
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
7.1
Surface form
7.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
7.8
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mikrut L.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
86

Mikrut L.: 20 days rest · Kolar Z.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Napolitano S.
Feldbausch K.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Napolitano S.
Cadenasso G.
6-36-3
Feldbausch K.
Mikrut L.
6-33-66-4
Quarter-finals
Feldbausch K.
Topo M.[5]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-16-2
Mikrut L.
Kolar Z.[2]
6-26-1
Cadenasso G.
Sels J.[8]
6-46-0
R16
Napolitano S.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-0
Cadenasso G.
Ritschard A.[4]
6-22-66-4
Topo M.[5]
Strombachs R.
7-50-66-3
Kolar Z.[2]
Fonio G.
4-67-626-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-666-2
Feldbausch K.
Cecchinato M.[3]
3-66-16-4
Sels J.[8]
Novak D.
6-36-756-4
Mikrut L.
Prihodko O.[7]
6-40-0
R32
Prihodko O.[7]
Chazal M.
6-46-2
Arnaboldi F.
Travaglia S.[1]
W/O
Napolitano S.
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-4
Novak D.
Kopp S.
4-66-37-5
Strombachs R.
Piraino G.
6-36-4
Cecchinato M.[3]
Gadamauri B.
6-14-67-64
Fonio G.
Romano F.
7-646-4
Kolar Z.[2]
Popovic S.
7-56-1
Cadenasso G.
Oradini G.
6-36-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Pennaforti G.
7-54-66-3
Moro Canas A.[6]
Iannaccone F.
6-06-0
Feldbausch K.
Weis A.
7-56-3
Topo M.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Sels J.[8]
Vanshelboim E.
6-37-5
Mikrut L.
Carboni L.
6-16-4
Ritschard A.[4]
Gentzsch T.
6-24-4