Cannon Kingsley vs Thijmen Loof — Rennes CH Qualifying Round 1

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA8
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
NED
Thijmen Loof
#1479ATP
23 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLL
Kingsley C.
6-1 7-6
Loof T.
Kingsley C.
6772
Loof T.
1650

Cannon Kingsley defeated Thijmen Loof 6-1 7-6 in the Rennes CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cannon Kingsley came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Loof T.

Loof T.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Loof T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (52 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Loof T.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 140 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
2.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Janvier M.[5]
Gobat A.
2-66-46-4
Couacaud E.[2]
Catry R.[10]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.[8]
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-647-64
Vylegzhanin N.[1]
Bertimon M.
6-43-66-3
Raquillet L.
Faut P.
6-40-66-2
De Schepper K.[11]
Brady P.
6-756-46-4
Q1
Couacaud E.[2]
Wallart E.
6-24-66-2
Janvier M.[5]
Olivetti A.
6-46-3
Gobat A.
Paire B.[12]
6-36-2
Gerasimov E.[6]
Covato M.
6-27-5
Bertimon M.
Reymond A.[9]
7-54-66-2
Catry R.[10]
Trochu P.
6-26-3
Brady P.
Moroni F.[3]
6-47-5
De Schepper K.[11]
Tepmahc N.
7-56-1
Faut P.
Massard L.[4]
7-646-3
Raquillet L.
Corwin F.[7]
6-37-66
Kingsley C.[8]
Loof T.
6-17-65