Janice Tjen vs Francesca Jones — Sao Paulo Semi-final

Sao Paulo · WTA · Semi-final
INA
Janice Tjen
#39WTA
1658ELO
1684Hard ELO
$630kYTD
$984kCAREER
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
Francesca Jones
GBR6
Francesca Jones
#123WTA
1619ELO
1581Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWL
Tjen J.
7-6 6-3
Jones F.
Tjen J.
7762
Jones F.
6030

Janice Tjen defeated Francesca Jones 7-6 6-3 in the Sao Paulo semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Janice Tjen came in ranked #39.

Key context

  • Match story: Janice Tjen closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tjen J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jones F.

Jones F.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tjen J.

Serve advantage — Tjen J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tjen J.Jones F.
53
Serve
3
13
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tjen J.Jones F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tjen J.Jones F.
Clutch Rating·Even
78
76
Break points saved·Even
84
80
Break points won·Slight edge
85
96
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tjen J.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Jones F.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+103 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1581
6.3Overall Elo 1658
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1619
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.9
Surface form
8.5
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tjen J.Jones F.
Freshness·Clear edge
95
80

Tjen J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Jones F.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Tjen J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Tjen J.
Jones F.[6]
7-606-3
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Zarazua R.[5]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Jones F.[6]
Sierra S.[2]
6-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Haddad Maia B.[1]
7-656-3
Tjen J.
Eala A.[3]
6-46-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Udvardy P.[8]
6-26-4
R16
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Pigossi L.
6-16-4
Udvardy P.[8]
Candiotto A.
6-36-3
Tjen J.
Okalova M.
6-16-0
Eala A.[3]
Riera J.
6-16-4
Sierra S.[2]
Leme Da Silva N.
6-06-4
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Rodriguez V.
7-56-1
Zarazua R.[5]
Cengiz B.
6-46-4
Jones F.[6]
Osuigwe W.
6-47-66
R32
Rodriguez V.
Tomljanovic A.[4]
6-44-2
Pigossi L.
Mandlik E.
2-66-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Fullana L.
6-26-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Sanchez A.
6-44-67-67
Candiotto A.
Strakhova V.
6-35-76-0
Udvardy P.[8]
Rogers A.
6-26-3
Riera J.
Diatchenko V.
6-37-61
Jones F.[6]
Glushko L.
4-66-26-3
Okalova M.
Rodionova A.
7-56-4
Eala A.[3]
Mansouri Y.
6-06-2
Cengiz B.
Ortenzi J.
6-16-2
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Tona M.
6-16-1
Leme Da Silva N.
Alves C.
6-706-26-0
Sierra S.[2]
Hartono A.
7-646-3
Tjen J.
Jeanjean L.[7]
6-26-3
Osuigwe W.
Barros V.
6-36-4