Rafael Jodar vs Luca Pow — Winston Salem CH Round of 16

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#26ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
GBR
Luca Pow
#999ATP
21 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Jodar R.
6-3 1-0
Pow L.
Jodar R.
61–
Pow L.
30–

Rafael Jodar advanced when Luca Pow retired 6-3 1-0 in the Winston Salem CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pow L.

Pow L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Pow L.
18
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Pow L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
61%
42%
Aces / match·Even
3.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pow L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 22 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Pow L.
Freshness·
82
—

Jodar R.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4