Janice Tjen vs Alexandra Eala — Sao Paulo Quarter-final

Sao Paulo · WTA · Quarter-final
INA
Janice Tjen
#42WTA
1658ELO
1684Hard ELO
$630kYTD
$984kCAREER
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
Alexandra Eala
PHI3
Alexandra Eala
#32WTA
1895ELO
1833Hard ELO
$871kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
21 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Tjen J.
6-4 6-1
Eala A.
Tjen J.
662
Eala A.
410

Janice Tjen defeated Alexandra Eala 6-4 6-1 in the Sao Paulo quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandra Eala came in ranked #32, but Janice Tjen had arrived on a 6-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tjen J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Eala A.

Eala A.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tjen J.

Serve advantage — Tjen J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tjen J.Eala A.
53
Serve
20
13
Return
63

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tjen J.Eala A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tjen J.Eala A.
Clutch Rating·Even
78
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
75
Break points won·Clear edge
85
97
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tjen J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Eala A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1684
Surface ELO
5.8+148 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1658
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1895
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.9
Surface form
8.5
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tjen J.Eala A.
Freshness·Clear edge
93
78

Tjen J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Eala A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 50 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Tjen J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Tjen J.
Jones F.[6]
7-606-3
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Zarazua R.[5]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Jones F.[6]
Sierra S.[2]
6-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Haddad Maia B.[1]
7-656-3
Tjen J.
Eala A.[3]
6-46-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Udvardy P.[8]
6-26-4
R16
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Pigossi L.
6-16-4
Udvardy P.[8]
Candiotto A.
6-36-3
Tjen J.
Okalova M.
6-16-0
Eala A.[3]
Riera J.
6-16-4
Sierra S.[2]
Leme Da Silva N.
6-06-4
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Rodriguez V.
7-56-1
Zarazua R.[5]
Cengiz B.
6-46-4
Jones F.[6]
Osuigwe W.
6-47-66
R32
Rodriguez V.
Tomljanovic A.[4]
6-44-2
Pigossi L.
Mandlik E.
2-66-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Fullana L.
6-26-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Sanchez A.
6-44-67-67
Candiotto A.
Strakhova V.
6-35-76-0
Udvardy P.[8]
Rogers A.
6-26-3
Riera J.
Diatchenko V.
6-37-61
Jones F.[6]
Glushko L.
4-66-26-3
Okalova M.
Rodionova A.
7-56-4
Eala A.[3]
Mansouri Y.
6-06-2
Cengiz B.
Ortenzi J.
6-16-2
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Tona M.
6-16-1
Leme Da Silva N.
Alves C.
6-706-26-0
Sierra S.[2]
Hartono A.
7-646-3
Tjen J.
Jeanjean L.[7]
6-26-3
Osuigwe W.
Barros V.
6-36-4