Martin Damm vs Emon Van Loben Sels — Winston Salem CH Round of 32

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
USA
Emon Van Loben Sels
#907ATP
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LL
Damm M.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Van Loben Sels E.
Damm M.
66862
Van Loben Sels E.
371031

Martin Damm defeated Emon Van Loben Sels 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Winston Salem CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Damm closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Van Loben Sels E.

Van Loben Sels E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Van Loben Sels E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
80%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
44%
Service points won·Clear edge
70%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Van Loben Sels E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Van Loben Sels E.
Freshness·
92
—

Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4