Cezar Cretu vs Mihai Alexandru Coman — Targu Mures CH Round of 32

Targu Mures CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Cezar Cretu
#268ATP
1524ELO
1492Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
clay
ROU
Mihai Alexandru Coman
#1458ATP
21 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLL
Cretu C.
6-3 6-2
Coman M.
Cretu C.
662
Coman M.
320

Cezar Cretu defeated Mihai Alexandru Coman 6-3 6-2 in the Targu Mures CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cretu C.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Coman M.

Coman M.serving51% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Cretu C.

Serve advantage — Cretu C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Cretu C.Coman M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
49%
36%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
52%
Return points won·Clear edge
44%
28%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
0.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (40 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cretu C.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Coman M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cretu C.Coman M.
Freshness·
80
—

Cretu C.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[1]
Poljicak M.[7]
6-10-0
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[1]
Jianu F.[3]
6-46-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.[1]
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-4
Jianu F.[3]
Palosi S.
6-42-66-3
Poljicak M.[7]
Cretu C.
6-36-2
Clarke J.[2]
Picchione A.
6-43-67-5
R16
Trungelliti M.[1]
Brunold M.
7-656-4
Agamenone F.
Rincon D.[6]
6-46-756-3
Jianu F.[3]
Neuchrist M.
6-36-2
Palosi S.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Picchione A.
Denolly C.[8]
6-46-0
Clarke J.[2]
Papoe R.
3-66-36-4
Cretu C.
Demanet E.
3-66-26-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Boitan G.
6-746-26-1
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Brunold M.
Alcala Gurri M.
Lopez Morillo I.
Oberleitner N.
Palosi S.
Neuchrist M.
Marti Pujolras A.
Tomescu D.
Cretu C.
Compagnucci T.
Damas M.
Demanet E.
Alvarez Varona N.[4]
6-33-0
Coman M.
Trungelliti M.[1]
Trungelliti M.[1]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-3
Brunold M.
Martin D.
7-636-3
Agamenone F.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-27-65
Jianu F.[3]
Compagnucci T.
6-26-1
Neuchrist M.
Damas M.
4-67-646-4
Marti Pujolras A.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-4
Palosi S.
Erhard M.[5]
7-656-4
Denolly C.[8]
Andreescu S.
6-26-2
Papoe R.
Campana Lee G.
6-47-66
Clarke J.[2]
Nijboer R.
6-36-2
Picchione A.
Gima S.
6-36-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Ionel N.
4-66-36-4
Boitan G.
Tomescu D.
6-36-1
Cretu C.
Coman M.
6-36-2
Rincon D.[6]
Lopez Morillo I.
6-26-3
Martin D.
Agamenone F.
Rincon D.[6]
Jianu F.[3]
Erhard M.[5]
Poljicak M.[7]
Ionel N.
Boitan G.