Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Mika Brunold — Targu Mures CH Round of 32

Targu Mures CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
clay
SUI
Mika Brunold
#408ATP
1466ELO
1407Clay ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Zapata Miralles B.
vs
Brunold M.

Bernabe Zapata Miralles defeated Mika Brunold in the Targu Mures CH round of 32 on clay.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zapata Miralles B.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Serve advantage — Brunold M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zapata Miralles B.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.2
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zapata Miralles B.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
24
Break points saved·Even
74
72
Break points won·Dominant
80
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zapata Miralles B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Brunold M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9+1 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Clay Elo 1407
4.3Overall Elo 1413
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1466
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[1]
Poljicak M.[7]
6-10-0
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[1]
Jianu F.[3]
6-46-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.[1]
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-4
Jianu F.[3]
Palosi S.
6-42-66-3
Poljicak M.[7]
Cretu C.
6-36-2
Clarke J.[2]
Picchione A.
6-43-67-5
R16
Trungelliti M.[1]
Brunold M.
7-656-4
Agamenone F.
Rincon D.[6]
6-46-756-3
Jianu F.[3]
Neuchrist M.
6-36-2
Palosi S.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Picchione A.
Denolly C.[8]
6-46-0
Clarke J.[2]
Papoe R.
3-66-36-4
Cretu C.
Demanet E.
3-66-26-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Boitan G.
6-746-26-1
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Brunold M.
Alcala Gurri M.
Lopez Morillo I.
Oberleitner N.
Palosi S.
Neuchrist M.
Marti Pujolras A.
Tomescu D.
Cretu C.
Compagnucci T.
Damas M.
Demanet E.
Alvarez Varona N.[4]
6-33-0
Coman M.
Trungelliti M.[1]
Trungelliti M.[1]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-3
Brunold M.
Martin D.
7-636-3
Agamenone F.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-27-65
Jianu F.[3]
Compagnucci T.
6-26-1
Neuchrist M.
Damas M.
4-67-646-4
Marti Pujolras A.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-4
Palosi S.
Erhard M.[5]
7-656-4
Denolly C.[8]
Andreescu S.
6-26-2
Papoe R.
Campana Lee G.
6-47-66
Clarke J.[2]
Nijboer R.
6-36-2
Picchione A.
Gima S.
6-36-4
Poljicak M.[7]
Ionel N.
4-66-36-4
Boitan G.
Tomescu D.
6-36-1
Cretu C.
Coman M.
6-36-2
Rincon D.[6]
Lopez Morillo I.
6-26-3
Martin D.
Agamenone F.
Rincon D.[6]
Jianu F.[3]
Erhard M.[5]
Poljicak M.[7]
Ionel N.
Boitan G.