Christian Langmo vs Darwin Blanch — Winston Salem CH Round of 16

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
USA
Darwin Blanch
#225ATP
1551ELO
1483Hard ELO
18 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Langmo C.
3-6 6-3 6-3
Blanch D.
Langmo C.
3662
Blanch D.
6331

Christian Langmo defeated Darwin Blanch 3-6 6-3 6-3 in the Winston Salem CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Blanch D.

Blanch D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Serve advantage — Blanch D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Blanch D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.9
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Blanch D.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 22 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
1.9Hard Elo 1254
Surface ELO
8.1+229 Hard Elo edge
0.9Overall Elo 1267
ELO gap
9.1Overall Elo 1551
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Blanch D.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
70

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Blanch D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 74 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4