Aidan Kim vs Blaise Bicknell — Winston Salem CH Round of 16

Winston Salem CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Aidan Kim
#661ATP
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
JAM
Blaise Bicknell
#318ATP
1313ELO
1290Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Kim A.
6-1 1-6 6-3
Bicknell B.
Kim A.
6162
Bicknell B.
1631

Aidan Kim defeated Blaise Bicknell 6-1 1-6 6-3 in the Winston Salem CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Kim closed it out in three sets, 6–1 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kim A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bicknell B.

Bicknell B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kim A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kim A.Bicknell B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (9 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kim A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Bicknell B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kim A.Bicknell B.
Freshness·
—
98

Bicknell B.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Svajda T.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Svajda T.
Jodar R.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Langmo C.
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-4
Jodar R.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Svajda T.
Cassone M.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Jodar R.
Pow L.
6-31-0
Ghibaudo A.
Damm M.
7-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-3
Kim A.
Bicknell B.
6-11-66-3
Krueger M.[3]
Perez A.
6-47-65
Cassone M.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Svajda T.
Rybakov A.[7]
6-36-3
Langmo C.
Blanch D.
3-66-36-3
R32
Langmo C.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-43-66-3
Blanch D.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Van Loben Sels E.
6-36-786-3
Jodar R.
Goode G.
7-56-1
Krueger M.[3]
Zink T.
6-16-2
Svajda T.
Ilagan A.
2-66-16-2
Sekulic P.
Milavsky D.
7-626-4
Cassone M.[2]
Williams C.
6-16-2
Rybakov A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Pow L.
Maloney P.[8]
6-26-3
Kim A.
Matsuda R.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Trotter J.
6-26-4
Perez A.
Winter E.
6-24-67-66
Pinnington Jones J.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-4
Bicknell B.
Monday J.[5]
6-45-77-5
Ghibaudo A.
Johns G.[6]
6-36-4