Bernard Tomic vs Yaojie Zeng — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS4
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 September 2025
hard
CHN
Yaojie Zeng
#872ATP
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Tomic B.
6-4 6-1
Zeng Y.
Tomic B.
662
Zeng Y.
410

Bernard Tomic defeated Yaojie Zeng 6-4 6-1 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zeng Y.

Zeng Y.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Tomic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Zeng Y.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
32%
Break points saved·Clear edge
64%
48%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
7.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zeng Y.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Zeng Y.
Freshness·
81
—

Tomic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zeppieri G.
Uchiyama Y.
7-627-5
Semi-finals
Zeppieri G.
Hsu Y.[7]
7-656-3
Uchiyama Y.
Tomic B.[4]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Hsu Y.[7]
Zhou Y.
4-66-17-65
Tomic B.[4]
Jasika O.
6-47-62
Zeppieri G.
Peliwo F.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Noguchi R.
5-76-26-4
R16
Peliwo F.
Evans D.[1]
6-43-62-2
Zeppieri G.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-1
Tomic B.[4]
Huang T.
6-36-1
Noguchi R.
Crawford O.
6-41-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Simakin I.
6-06-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Samrej K.
7-56-4
Zhou Y.
Tokuda R.
6-16-2
Jasika O.
Sun F.
2-66-26-4
R32
Peliwo F.
Van Assche L.
6-40-0
Zhou Y.
Nishioka Y.[3]
2-67-652-0
Zeppieri G.
Onclin G.
6-46-4
Tokuda R.
Isomura K.
6-06-2
Samrej K.
Wu T.
0-67-57-5
Hsu Y.[7]
Cui J.
6-26-1
Sun F.
Mccabe J.[5]
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.
Gea A.
7-56-4
Simakin I.
Zhukayev B.[6]
6-46-777-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Shimabukuro S.[8]
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Watanuki Y.[2]
6-47-5
Huang T.
Bai Y.
6-36-0
Tomic B.[4]
Zeng Y.
6-46-1
Evans D.[1]
Xiao L.
6-46-4
Crawford O.
Sharipov M.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Te R.
4-66-22-0